Min Hee-jin to remain CEO of ADOR, HYBE appoints three new board members following shareholders meeting

Date:


Several new changes have been made at the much-awaited shareholders meeting between HYBE and ADOR held in Seoul on Friday. According to a report by the Korea Times, HYBE has added three of its executives to the board of its sublabel ADOR. However, Min Hee-jin will retain her position as CEO of ADOR. (Also Read | HYBE Chairman Bang Si-hyuk calls ADOR’s Min Hee-jin ‘malicious person’ in first public statement)

A legal battle has been going on between ADOR and HYBE for the past few weeks.

HYBE, ADOR hold shareholders meeting

HYBE had planned to remove Hee-jin as ADOR CEO during Friday’s shareholder meeting. She is accused of conspiring with associates to seize control of the company. She has denied the allegations. HYBE owns an 80 percent stake in Ador. The shareholders’ meeting was held at an undisclosed location. It was held in line with a court ruling on Thursday that granted an injunction to prevent HYBE from exercising its voting rights at the shareholders’ meeting to remove Hee-jin.

Get exclusive access to the latest news on India’s general elections, only on the HT App. Download Now! Download Now!

Have any new changes been made?

According to Korea Times’ sources, the three new board members are HYBE’s chief human resources officer Kim Joo-young, chief strategy officer Lee Jae-sang, and chief financial officer Lee Kyung-jun. The previous two board members, identified as Kim and Shin, were removed from their positions at ADOR. They were close associates of Hee-jin. Reportedly, HYBE wants to clear up confusion among ADOR employees by introducing the three executives to the situation.

HYBE now in more control on board

The new board structure gives HYBE more control over the board. The dispute between HYBE and ADOR began on April 22 this year. HYBE launched an audit into ADOR’s management, as they suspected that Hee-jin had attempted to seize control of their company.

Court ruling

On Thursday, the Seoul Central District Court said that Hee-jin had “clearly” sought independent control of ADOR. However, she did not reach the actual implementation stage. The court further said that this amounted to “betrayal” but not the same as the “betrayal” claimed by HYBE.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Discover more from AyraNews24x7

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading