The success of Openai’s deep research model, China-based Deepsek-R1’s efficient and low-cost development, and increasing investment in the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) all show that the countries are positively align and economic and economic and competition taxes Are you Geophysical benefits of AI. While the speed of AI development is exponential, AI regulation and struggle to maintain public understanding speed. The construction of this optimism around the need for AI adoption and responsible AI development, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Emmanuel Macron-11-12 February to develop AI on 11-12 February. Emphasized the need for international cooperation. Good for the public. This brings us to the cardinal question as to how the global community will develop AI responsibility and how important will India’s role be in it?
With the life cycle of AI, it is important to have a deep understanding of the influence of AI, especially in local contexts, to carry forward-AE development and deployment-people-centered AI along with a life cycle. An important step in this process is analyzing AI adoption in the development sector, where real -world application can disclose adoption trends and challenges.
India has seen an increase in AI-operated initiatives, especially non-profit and social enterprise, to empower farmers, women and marginalized communities in rural and remote areas. Notable programs include Jugalbandi of OpenEAI, an AI conversion structure that focuses on changing the Indian justice system, and provides AI services to the Gliffic, development sector of Tech4DEV. Such initiative has provided rich information on obstacles, underlying technical boundaries, bias and risks related to AI adoption in India.
In his address to the Planery session of the Paris AI Summit, Modi highlighted the idea that AI should be focused and contained in local eco-system, which is powered by quality data sets and open-source systems. He said that countries should work together to maintain shared values, address risks and build a trust required to construct the necessary governance and standards. In addition, advocating the idea that AI should be people-focused, the India-France AI Policy Roundable of the Summit emphasized access to AI resources and collaborated to develop the AI regulatory structure. Major discussion points included opportunities for international cooperation in the lack of arbitration mechanisms for border data flow, global AI standards and data interoperability, and AI research.
The National Institute of France to assess the security of India’s AI Safety Institute, and AI for AI Security Summit for the 2023 AI Security Summit Can work together for. India’s approach to the roundateable has been affected by the recent report of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (Meity) on the AI Governance Guidelines Development for public consultation. Published on 6 January, the report advocates an entire government’s approach, where AI regime structures consider the AI life cycle and the role of various stakeholders. It also suggests the establishment of an inter-minister AI Coordination Committee, which brings various ministries and departments of the government together to understand AI development, adoption and regulatory landscape.
Having drawn a conclusion, the Meety Report advocates the development of the AI regime structure built on local references, and the border cooperation requires an understanding of national requirements, data availability, data policies and current status of AI use. It also advises to establish a technical secretariat to take care of it. The Technical Secretariat will pool different domain experts to better understand the AI landscape from areas such as agriculture, health care, education and AI life cycle. In Paris, the proposed technical secretariats should be established to cooperate under the Mety and France’s economy, finance, and industrial and digital sovereignty to achieve cross-border cooperation during the 2nd India-France AI roundateable in Paris. Could, periodically assess the impact of AI, and refine the structure of the regime.
With the shape of India’s AI Safety Institute and Insia of France, the two countries have a unique opportunity to co-develop the risk evaluation structure that balances innovation with security. Analysis of real -world applications in India, such as AI adoption and assessing homegron language models in the development sector, will be a large part of it, identifying adoption trends to Indian and French policy makers, assessing obstacles And addressing the gaps in the infrastructure, regulations, and access. It will be interesting to see if India and France can jointly develop AI governance framework for next year’s summit, which is likely to be hosted by India.
The article is written by Arun Teja Polkampali, JSW Science and Technology Fellow, Asia Society Policy Institute, New Delhi.
